I learnt that the ancestors of Hungarians and Finns were Asiatic tribes from the east of the Urals, though both countries lie in Europe.
But I couldn't associate today's Hungarians and Finns with any kind of Asians, judging by their appearance.
I'm also from Asia (more precisely from Korea in the Far East).
Many of both people have blond hair like ordinary Europeans.Is it true that the ancestors of Hungarians and Finns were Asiatic tribes from the east of the Urals?
The Tartars(Tatars) from Mongolia frequently rode into towns throughout the Baltic countries, like Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia,parts of Russia and even parts of East Germany to throw a wild party. The natives couldn't always hide their girls fast enough. As a result many people in that part of the world have oriental eyes in varying degrees. They are in my mother's family. The actor, Charles Bronson, was an example, his father was a mixture of Lithuanian and Tartar.Is it true that the ancestors of Hungarians and Finns were Asiatic tribes from the east of the Urals?
Everyone has roots back to warm, toasty places if you go back enough eons. It's a matter of migration, war/aggression, intermarriage and cultural assimilation. DNA projects are tying the Hungarians back to the Indian-subcontinent and the Finns to Russian/Chinese tribes. But they haven't fixed the timelines on the migrations yet.
Hungarians are from Asia. We don't know exactly where exactly from, my guess is around Mongolia. I don't know about the Finns. I don't see any similarities between the two languages either. As for blond hair ... Hungarians have been in their current location since 896 AD... And what do ';ordinary'; Europeans look like?
Scientists, linguists, and anthropologists have proved no theory about the ancestors of the Magyars. It is a complete mystery. Your theory may or may not be true. There is no proof. Anyone presenting an origin of the Magyars is merely speculating.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment